Limited Access Section
Limited Access Section
I see that in the Experiences section and the Bad Ideas section one needs only to register in order to view them. What I am thinking of is a section where the administrators/moderators must use their own discretion to approve members before they are able to access it.
What are your thoughts?
Good idea? Bad idea?
Or maybe it already exists...
What are your thoughts?
Good idea? Bad idea?
Or maybe it already exists...
- Xanatos
- Moderator
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:51 am
- Location: The last place you look.
- Contact:
Re: Limited Access Section
Doesn't sound like a bad idea (no pun intended), I'll chat to Secant about it.
If it does I think somebody would've said something by now.fx1k wrote:Or maybe it already exists...
We are all books containing thousands of pages and within each lies an irreparable truth.
What is locked, can be opened. What is hidden, can be found. What is yours... can be mine.
What is locked, can be opened. What is hidden, can be found. What is yours... can be mine.
Re: Limited Access Section
Yes, this has come up in the past. The prevailing opinion at that point was that it's a good idea, but the point of this web site is to share information, not hide it.
- theconfusedone
- Member
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Limited Access Section
I agree, secant, but i think this new section would be for those of us who are trusted and are more interested in a very personal and helpful community full of people who actually post
Quite frankly, there are a lot of lurkers who don't do much... As i talked to Fx1k, he stated that this would only have the people who contribute and want to contribute and share, and others would be motivated to post and be active if they knew they could be part of an exclusive community...
I think it's a fine idea, and would generate the ideal environment for us night oppers and not just for those people who use the information posted here for reasons that are unethical and immoral. It would be the perfect forum for those of us truly interested in this "sport/hobby/activity" where we wouldnt have to worry about those people, and could actually interact with the people that care about night opping.
Just my opinion. I'm all for it, if, of course, the admins agree.
Quite frankly, there are a lot of lurkers who don't do much... As i talked to Fx1k, he stated that this would only have the people who contribute and want to contribute and share, and others would be motivated to post and be active if they knew they could be part of an exclusive community...
I think it's a fine idea, and would generate the ideal environment for us night oppers and not just for those people who use the information posted here for reasons that are unethical and immoral. It would be the perfect forum for those of us truly interested in this "sport/hobby/activity" where we wouldnt have to worry about those people, and could actually interact with the people that care about night opping.
Just my opinion. I'm all for it, if, of course, the admins agree.
No one saves us but ourselves. No one can and no one may. We ourselves must walk the path. -Siddhartha Gautama
The above post is completely hypothetical.
The above post is completely hypothetical.
Re: Limited Access Section
OK, you have a good point about a "special area" being motivation for users to get more involved with NONET. How would we decide who to allow access though? Subjective criteria (e.g. mod/admin recommendation) are bad, since they can be abused, and because they require constant effort that the staff might not be able to commit to in the long term. But, objective criteria (e.g. post count) is just as bad, since a user can spam enough short posts to reach the threshold. It's a tough dilemma, but I'm open to ideas. What do you think?
Re: Limited Access Section
It is difficult to avoid a subjective selection and pick members who can be trusted at the same time... Maybe a larger body of members than just the staff could vote on approving members? The body would start with the staff then expand I guess?Secant wrote:OK, you have a good point about a "special area" being motivation for users to get more involved with NONET. How would we decide who to allow access though? Subjective criteria (e.g. mod/admin recommendation) are bad, since they can be abused, and because they require constant effort that the staff might not be able to commit to in the long term. But, objective criteria (e.g. post count) is just as bad, since a user can spam enough short posts to reach the threshold. It's a tough dilemma, but I'm open to ideas. What do you think?
Perhaps instead of recommendations there could be an application system to bring members into the spotlight? (The only time on NONET where being in a spotlight would be considered a good thing.)
Anyway, I think some objective standards are needed. It wouldn't be a good idea to let somebody with only 15 posts to be allowed access. Little information can be derived about the person from just those 15 posts. There needs to be a minimum. After they reach the minimum is when they can apply and their posts can be reviewed. It's quality over quantity, but there needs to be quantity to ensure a certain quality.
Just a couple ideas.
-
- Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Limited Access Section
I have seen other forums where in order to enter "Limited Access Sections" you had to have posted a certain number of posts, been a member for a certain length of time, and verified you legitimacy in some way.Secant wrote:OK, you have a good point about a "special area" being motivation for users to get more involved with NONET. How would we decide who to allow access though? Subjective criteria (e.g. mod/admin recommendation) are bad, since they can be abused, and because they require constant effort that the staff might not be able to commit to in the long term. But, objective criteria (e.g. post count) is just as bad, since a user can spam enough short posts to reach the threshold. It's a tough dilemma, but I'm open to ideas. What do you think?
As far as verifying your legitimacy goes, completing an Op and providing proof on the dares forum might suffice.
Re: Limited Access Section
I rather like the idea of having an application. Such a system would make the vetting process simpler since staff wouldn't have to constantly watch for members to promote. A good balance might be to set certain objective criteria, then allow users to apply for membership after meeting those criteria.
I'm warming to this idea; it's definitely worth a try. I'm going to be making some big changes to NONET soon, and it's fair to say that a trial of this system will be among them. If anyone has anything else to add about the limited access area, please post about it here.
I'm warming to this idea; it's definitely worth a try. I'm going to be making some big changes to NONET soon, and it's fair to say that a trial of this system will be among them. If anyone has anything else to add about the limited access area, please post about it here.
- Xanatos
- Moderator
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:51 am
- Location: The last place you look.
- Contact:
Re: Limited Access Section
If this idea goes ahead how many of us would be active participants? I've seen a similar LA section on another Ninjitsu site (which disintegrated) and it was nothing more than a scorched ghost town, if you know what I mean.
We are all books containing thousands of pages and within each lies an irreparable truth.
What is locked, can be opened. What is hidden, can be found. What is yours... can be mine.
What is locked, can be opened. What is hidden, can be found. What is yours... can be mine.
Re: Limited Access Section
Yeah, I know what you mean. Hopefully the idea of it being exclusive would play a role in amping up the amount of participation on the forum by the lurking members.Xanatos wrote:If this idea goes ahead how many of us would be active participants? I've seen a similar LA section on another Ninjitsu site (which disintegrated) and it was nothing more than a scorched ghost town, if you know what I mean.
There are tons of people with zero posts.
-
- Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Limited Access Section
This is why I think that we should have criteria that includes having posted a certain number of posts.fx1k wrote:There are tons of people with zero posts.
Re: Limited Access Section
Keep in mind that when this gets deployed, the rules won't be immutable. I'll try to pick some reasonable ones, then we can adjust as necessary.
Re: Limited Access Section
I like these words. :mrgreen:Secant wrote:Keep in mind that when this gets deployed, the rules won't be immutable. I'll try to pick some reasonable ones, then we can adjust as necessary.